<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Charlotte Real Estate, Development, and Construction News: Mecklenburg Times &#187; University Investments Group</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mecktimes.com/news/tag/university-investments-group/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mecktimes.com</link>
	<description>Real Estate, Development, and Construction News in the Charlotte Area</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 14:19:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Apartment plans draw backlash&#160;</title>
		<link>http://mecktimes.com/news/2012/02/23/apartment-plans-draw-backlash/</link>
		<comments>http://mecktimes.com/news/2012/02/23/apartment-plans-draw-backlash/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 21:21:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tara Ramsey, staff writer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Construction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UNC Charlotte]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[University City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[University Investments Group]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mecktimes.com/news/2012/02/23/apartment-plans-draw-backlash/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To University Investments Group, the site at University City Boulevard and Mallard Creek Road would be a good place to build 250 apartments for college students.

But to some nearby businesspeople, it’s a harebrained idea when, they say, there aren’t enough grocery stores and pharmacies nearby to service the people who would live in the apartments. Plus, critics say, the proposed 90-foot-tall tower would not fit in with the area.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://mecktimes.com/news/2012/02/23/apartment-plans-draw-backlash/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
